Hundreds of thousands of buyers.We reach every one that fits.
For companies selling into a very large market, across many industries and many roles, where the deal is small and the person matters more than the company. We identify who fits, engage them on email, LinkedIn and WhatsApp, and keep testing the message until one lands. Then we put the volume behind that one.
He will tell you how many of your buyers we can actually find, and which sources we would use to find them.
Four things are usually true.
Rapid Outbound is not a faster version of our other outbound service. It is a different shape of problem, and it needs different machinery.
Sometimes into the millions. A list you could build by hand in a week is not this service.
Not one tidy segment with one job title. The same product sells to a practice owner, an operations manager and a founder, and none of them read the same message.
No single account justifies a week of research, so the work has to be right at volume rather than right one account at a time.
One company can hold a perfect fit and twenty people who will never buy. Company-level filters cannot tell them apart.
If three of those are true, your bottleneck is not the message. It is how many of the right people have seen it.
We build the list from wherever the people actually are.
No single database holds a market this shape. We pull from the sources that hold each kind of person, then match, dedupe and verify across all of them into one list with one record per human being.
Role, seniority, tenure and employer. The backbone for anything defined by a job title.
Funding, stage and headcount. Finds companies at the moment they start buying.
Anything with a street address. Clinics, practices, firms, dealerships, studios, showrooms.
Who is hiring for what. Gives you the account, the timing and the exact gap they are trying to fill.
Medical councils, bar associations, engineering and accounting boards. Verified, credentialed, and on no sales database.
Industry associations publish their members. Most of those lists are not sold anywhere.
Anyone who paid to attend a conference has already told you their category and their budget.
G2, Clutch, Trustpilot, Glassdoor, Yelp. Who uses what, and who is publicly unhappy with it.
GitHub, Stack Overflow, Kaggle. The only reliable way to find people by what they can actually do.
Scholar, ORCID, PubMed, faculty pages. Named specialists by field, by publication and by institution.
Directors, filings, licences and tenders. Public, structured, and almost never used.
Reddit, Discord, Telegram, industry Slack groups. Where a niche says out loud who it is.
Which sources apply depends entirely on who you sell to. Most programmes run four or five of these. We tell you which ones before we start, and what each is likely to yield.
A list is not an industry and a headcount band.
Segment filters hand you every company in a category, which is not the same as every person who buys. We define the buyer as a person, with the facts that make them a buyer attached, and then we prove those facts for each one before anything is sent.
If you can describe your buyer in a sentence, we can usually build the list.
Three channels, run together.
A market this size does not answer on one channel. Email reaches everybody. LinkedIn reaches the people who have not opened an email at work in a year. WhatsApp reaches the ones who use neither. Running them one after another wastes months finding that out.
Sequenced across a large pool of sending domains and inboxes, at volumes no single domain could carry. Every send is monitored, and the infrastructure behind it is built to be replaced rather than protected.
Connection requests first, then a message to the ones who accept. Paced to look like a person because it has to be, which caps the daily number and makes the list quality matter more, not less.
The highest reply rate of the three by a distance, and the easiest to get wrong. Used late in a sequence, used sparingly, and only where the number was collected legitimately.
Each person sits in one sequence across all three channels, so nobody gets the same message twice and nobody gets all three in a day.
Built to be scaled, and built to be thrown away.
Volume wears out sending infrastructure. That is not a risk to be managed, it is a certainty to be planned for. So we treat it as consumable: more capacity standing by than we are using, and nothing that matters depending on any single domain or inbox.
- Domains bought in blocks and aged before a single email goes out of them.
- Inboxes provisioned well before they are needed and held in reserve.
- Warming runs continuously, so a reserve inbox is ready the day it is called on.
- Deliverability, bounce rate and inbox placement tracked per inbox and per domain.
- Sending caps held well below platform limits, on purpose, permanently.
- Content varied across every send, so no two inboxes look like the same campaign.
- An inbox that degrades is pulled the same day and a warm one takes its volume.
- Domains isolated per segment, so one bad list cannot damage the rest of the programme.
- Suppression and deduplication across every channel and every campaign we run for you.
None of it is shared with another client's programme.
Volume is what makes testing honest.
With eight hundred prospects, a message test takes a quarter before the numbers mean anything, and by then the answer has stopped being useful. With fifty thousand, the same test returns a real answer in a fortnight. The search for the right message is not shorter here. The wait between answers is.
Four or five messages go out in the same window, each to its own slice of the list.
Sized before the send, so the answer is a result rather than a hopeful reading of nine replies.
The subject, or the offer, or the channel, or the segment. Change two and you learn nothing from either.
The rest are retired and written down, so nobody proposes them again in six months.
The cycle repeats on whatever is now the weakest part of the sequence.
Every round is written down: what changed, what happened, and what we decided. The next test starts from that rather than from an opinion.
One number. Everything is inside it.
Most agencies quote a retainer and then invoice data, tooling, domains and inboxes on top, so you find out what a programme this size costs after you have spent it. At this volume that gap is not a rounding error. We quote one number that covers what we build, what we run and what we spend on your behalf.
Covers up to 50,000 individuals identified and 100,000 touches a month across email, LinkedIn and WhatsApp.
- List building across every source your market needs. Sourced, matched, deduplicated and verified.
- All sending infrastructure. Domains, inboxes, warming, rotation and monitoring, built and run by us.
- Every send, on email, on LinkedIn and on WhatsApp.
- Message testing run continuously, with a written verdict on every round.
- Replies read and qualified before anything reaches your calendar.
- A number every week, and a written readout every month.
More volume, more markets or more channels are quoted on top of this. We will tell you what your programme actually needs before you commit to it, including when the answer is that it needs less.
He designs the targeting and the test plan for every Rapid Outbound programme, and he is the person you meet on the first call. If a market your shape is not worth running this way, he will say so on that call rather than after the first invoice.
Three things have to be true.
- 01Your market runs to six figures of people, not four.
- 02Your deal is small enough that no single account justifies bespoke research.
- 03You would rather find the message that works than send more of the one that does not.
Thirty minutes with Kunal.
Tell him who you sell to. He will tell you roughly how many of them we can find, which sources we would use to find them, and whether a market your shape is worth running this way at all. If it is not, he will say so on the call.